main logo

Life Time Calendar

I 10 migliori prodotti di novembre 2024
Ultimo aggiornamento: 14 novembre 2024
John Peters
John Peters
"Enhanced Productivity Calendar" Time Management for Better Work/Exercise/Life Balance, for Better Intellectual and Physical Health, and for much Better Quality of Life.
star

82

QUALITÀ AFFIDABILE

VEDI SU AMAZON
Amazon.it
#5

  • Our main goals are (1) To maximize productivity levels, i.e. performance, efficiency; and at the same time, (2)To maximize R&&R, Rest and Relaxation: leisure time, quality time, better quality of life, personal time; and actually implement the pursuit of happiness paradigm that the constitution and the early settlers wanted us to have.
  • The Agile methodologies primary goals are: (1) Maximizing resource efforts, (2) Minimizing waste and (3) Maintain high quality throughout the process: THE GOALS MATCH
  • A freshly hired employee can get up to 12 times * (1+3+1) = 5 days off in-a-row every calendar year, that is one 5 days-off in-a-row every month, or 6 times * 9-days-off in-a-row, 1+3+1+3+1 = 9 x (12/2), that is one 9-days off in a row every 2 months. or other combinations, by arrangement with their managers/supervisors.
  • Most of the problems arise from systemic failures in the 5&&2 work-cycle structure that any time management strategies could not solve, they do not come even close to describe how to “Not waste time”, because “Wasting time” is part of the basic building blocks - front and center - of the 5&&2 work-cycle structure that we have and as we describe in Figure 4-1 on Productivity loss, and time wasted, then as we demonstrate in the chapters that follow how we harvest the hours of time wasted in the 5&&2 schedule, and transform them to full productivity or full R&&R in the new 3&&1 schedule. Some countries are still running on the 6&&1 model.
  • At any one time a large proportion of the population (up to 30%) have responsibilities for family members, mothers and fathers taking care of infant babies, relatives caring for the elderly, sick, or disabled relatives, these care-takers might have 2,3 or 4 days available to work every 7 or 8 days, but at the moment society/businesses have mostly two categories full time with benefits, or well-fare; plainly the incentive for the care takers is to go or stay on welfare. Employers do not offer much part/time work because of the rigid, inflexibility of the 5&&2 structure; whereas the 3&&1 schedule offers much more flexibility, mainly it has finer granularity of almost half the blocking factor at 4 days in a row, instead of the present 7-days in a row coarse blocking factor. That is in the 3&&1 we have much smaller blocks that people can mix and match more freely and more easily for work or for rest. Two (2) workers, each working half/time, part-timers, could work as one full time staff position, similar to: (3 + 1) + (3 + 1), think Algebra here; one person works the first shift of 3 days, a second person would work the second shift for 3 days. There would be more available work in the category above. Now in conjunction with the Affordable Care Act, and the flexibility of the 3&&1, these care-takers could work half time or part time, instead of having them rely on government services, this would give them pride to contribute to their own welfare; this will also lessen the demands on government budgets and smooths the way for social prosperity, Contributing to work means making some money, thus less need from society, and less poverty, which leads to more prosperity, to less crime, etc., which leads to less need to spend on policing, which again leads to lower taxes: it’s a virtuous cycle.
  • 0,00 € SU AMAZON